|
|
|
M.I.N Home | Archives | Our Articles | Photo Journal | About US | Resources | Links | Contact Us |
|
THE BLACK
COMMUNITY MUST ACKNOWLEDGE ITS LEADERS by
Dr. Lorne Foster
Animals in the wild engage in “territoriality” in their
physical environment. Zoologists use the term to represent an area
that is first rendered distinctive by its animal-owner in a particular
way, and, secondly is defended by the owner. The major components of
this process in nature involve personalization by
marking-off an area of terrain, and defense by
warding-off all unwanted intruders.
For humans, on the other hand, territoriality has another
dimension at the level of consciousness, or cognitive landscape.
That is, what distinguishes the Alfa animal if you will
– as opposed to animals in the wild laying down their scent to mark
their turf – is that human life involves marking out provinces of
meaning as well as physical terrain. Human beings engage in mental
territoriality in conjunction with physical territoriality; and
intricate forms of territory rights often exist at the level of
values, beliefs and cognitive structures.
For sociologists, the subtlety of these meaning maps
or psychic spaces in society does not make them less
real. In fact, in modern multi-racial societies like Canada, based on
principles of democratic pluralism and formal equality, territoriality
and the dynamics of racial dominance-subordination are routinely
transferred from expressed public domains to the social-psychological
level.
For instance, consider how every time a prominent Black leader
from Africa or the United States is honored in Canada, it is used to
“inferiorize” Black leadership here, and render it impotent,
inept, ineffective, pointless, irrelevant and unremarkable.
First – in our recent past – it was Bishop Desmond Tutu who
received an honorary Doctorate from The Law Society of Upper Canada in
June 2000; then it was General Colin Powell who was implored to come
and help the provincial government sell a major private-public
partnership to rescue “inner-city” youth at risk, dubbed
“Ontario's Promise”; then former South African President Nelson
Mandela – already an Honorary Companion of the Order of Canada in
1998 – received honorary Canadian citizenship, and Park Public
School in Regent Park was renamed Nelson Mandela Park Public School;
and most recently, Reverend Jesse Jackson – a former United States
presidential candidate, well-known for his missions abroad – was
flown in to rally Toronto hotel workers in support of their efforts to
win higher wages.
Whereas – and by all accounts – the Canadian visits of
international luminaries like Tutu, Powell, Mandela and Jackson have
immediately bolstered spirits and electrified the crowds; in the bigger
picture, they can be a subliminally devastating shot to the solar plexis
of Black community. For what may appear on the surface as a gesture of
hospitality and respect, can function at a deeper level as a way for the
dominant White society to keep the indigenous Black population in its
place, and out of the coveted places of power and prerogative in
society.
In short – no matter how well-deserved – bestowing lavish
honors on foreign Black leadership is an act that implicitly diminishes
the similarly-dedicated life-work of the Gwen Robinsons, the Stanley
Grizzles, the Dr. Sheldon Taylors, the Zanana Akandes, the Dudley Laws,
the Bromley Armstrongs, the Sandra Whittings, the Charles Roachs, the
Hugh Grahams, the Lennox Farrells, the Jennifer Schroeders and others
who have committed the balance of their lives to the pursuit of racial
equality within Canada. Moreover, by diminishing the life-work and
sacrifice of Canada’s most courageous Black leaders, it can undermine
the life-force and very sense of self-worth of the entire Black
community; thereby functioning as a surreptitious defense of the White
status quo power grid in society.
So, take note that the very act of elevating Black leadership
from Africa and the United States can have negative inferences in regard
to the credibility and dimension of Black leadership in Canada, and
adverse consequences for the Black community and the state of race
relations and power-sharing here.
Today, consciously or unconsciously, one of the most effective
forms of social-psychological territoriality, and subliminal defense
against social change, is to make a group’s leaders irrelevant. Once a
group’s leaders are made to look trivial, unimportant and
inconsequential, than the group by extension is made to look as if it
has no creditable claim to the coveted domain of power and authority in
the citizen democracy, and is not rightfully entitled to share fully in
the benefits and privileges attached.
On this account, while acknowledging the attainments of
international Black luminaries, it is important for Canada’s Black
community to skillfully guard against being made to appear infantile or
inconsequential by default. When the great Black leaders from Africa and
the United States and around the world come to town, it is imperative to
not let their profile inadvertently wrecking havoc on the
equality-seeking efforts here. Instead, they must be held responsible
for using their profile creatively, in order to work with and for the
community not against it.
So, the next time Jesse Jackson brings his traveling civil rights
road-show to town – dancing to the beat of African rhythms and
electrify the crowds – let him mark the occasion by dancing alongside
Gwen, or Stanley, or Sheldon, or Zanana, or Dudley, or Bromley, or
Sandra, or Charles, or Hugh, or Lennox, or Jennifer, or all of the
above. Or let him stay at home.
|
|